Chief Technology Officers deal with problems in technology, management, and strategy that are always changing and bringing with them new possibilities and hazards. CTOs need adaptable trustworthy solutions since they must establish strong and resilient strategies in the face of disruptive developments and a talent shortage. An IT outsourcing partner can help ease staff management stress, improve engineering capabilities, and provide the necessary tech know-how.
Have you ever remained up all night wondering that a simple phishing scam or faulty coding will bring your entire business to an end?
You are not alone. There is a serious danger from malware and data breaches. The newest form of hacking is called ransomware. The goal of ransomware is to prevent a corporation from accessing its own data so that a ransom may be demanded to gain access. This is different from breaking in to recover sensitive data. Cyber security lapses put a digital company’s existence in danger, whether they are the result of a planned hack or a simple human error.
CTOs spend time and resources preventing cyber security breaches, but with so many potential attack vectors, it can be difficult to develop a successful security programme. Fortunately, when you make important decisions regarding cyber security, this Blog will guide you through some of the key security-related challenges and offer best practices
CTOs Need to Get Past Security Myths
Government initiatives led to technological advancements in security and compliance. Technology systems that delivered information safely and secretly were desired by the Defence Department. The Defence Department was not counting pennies, in contrast to your CFO. Therefore, there is a slight discrepancy when technology businesses today balance the advantages and disadvantages of security. Uncertainty and scepticism surround security issues. Questions such as „Are we really in danger of an outside attack?“ arise. Threats become overstated, while security is undervalued.
The objective of a CTO is to dispel this misunderstanding and establish a security-friendly corporate culture. In actuality, human mistake is the primary cause of almost all security breaches. Information exposure errors, developer access issues, and unauthorised access to sensitive information can all pose security risks. Whatever the issue’s origin, reducing human error is a top security concern because everyone makes mistakes occasionally.
Overcoming some widespread misunderstandings is necessary for a good security culture, but it also needs ongoing upkeep. Here, preserving bodily health is an excellent analogy. One trip to the doctor is not enough to achieve physical health. It needs little daily investment. For instance, having good physical health is influenced by a variety of factors, including healthy food, exercise, and lifestyle decisions. It is not much different in a superb security culture; it has daily activities that keep it in shape in addition to checkups at regular intervals.
It’s crucial to keep in mind that the CTO must appreciate the skills of each department as a security culture is established. To contribute to the development of a strong security culture, engineers should be in contact with the security structure and training. However, engineering should be their primary area of interest. Gaining the respect and trust you require for a successful security culture will be facilitated by respecting the talents of your personnel.
Regarding about Compliance
Since compliance and security are linked, security programmes frequently address compliance-related issues. As you learn about threat modelling, keep in mind that risks might result from compliance breaches. Legal problems resulting from legislation and regulation violations might obstruct your business’s progress and cost it money. Contractual compliance problems can result in significant time and financial losses.
The security requirements set forth by the payment card industry (PCI) for the protection of cardholder data are a common example. Contracts with service providers, partners and customers through vendors are used to implement these criteria. Customers will have more precise criteria to conduct business in an industry with strict regulations. Here, contractual and regulatory pressures interact to perhaps threaten your organisation. Along with internal mistakes or outside threats, a strong security programme will acknowledge and resolve these risks.
Using Threat Modelling to create a security structure
A CTO can develop a security programme by using threat modelling as one of its methods. Although there are numerous opportunities for security breaches, threat modelling can help your business identify and prioritise the greatest security concerns. Threat modelling is the technique of systematically grouping amorphous security issues. The assessment’s primary goals are to identify and address the assets, threats to those assets, and potential pathways for those threats. The objective is to increase security awareness so that the CTO has the ability to reduce risk.
The CTO can use threat modelling as a practical tool. The methodology specifically identifies and grades three key areas:
- The organisation’s assets.
- The adversaries of the organisation, what their goals are and how they plan to achieve them.
- The safeguards or precautions built into the organisation.
The purpose of the threat model is to convert the security or compliance risk into a list of listed commercial risks, which is why it is crucial to establish an accepted method of measuring risk.
This data is used by a CTO to create a roadmap for resolving the issues the model highlighted. A successful roadmap establishes quantifiable objectives and anticipated checkpoints over time. An effective roadmap can also produce an accountability matrix, giving managers the opportunity to decide crucial security matters. In a system where managers make small security decisions and the C-suite makes significant security decisions, an accountability matrix transfers responsibility for final approval from the CTO to the appropriate level of leadership.
Options for Preventative Action and Treatment
After the threat modelling is finished, the roadmap should outline the available preventative actions and treatments. Strong regression testing, error-checking controls, code reviews during the development process, automated testing, and live release testing are a few examples of these. The security tests are unique to the company’s system, however automation can be built to search for particular issues i.e risks discovered by threat modelling.Strong security measures require more than one stage, as was already indicated. It is an ongoing and constant step in the development process.
Testing for security flaws at the design stage is one best practice in this field. Finding mistakes early on is much more advantageous (and simpler), as they can be corrected with consequences that are exponentially more effective. Testing your security control methods is another popular practice. Assuming that all security control methods already in use are effective is a common error made by CTOs. To establish „Two factor authentication,“ for instance, it is fairly popular to use a 6-digit SMS security code, but its efficacy is debatable given the variety of ways there are to access SMS transmission.
Thinking like your opponents has one of the best abilities a CTO can have to enhance preventative actions. Despite being essentially a mental activity, considering yourself as your opponents will help you often consider the intentions and drives of parties that breach agreements. By using this procedure, security implementation can be guided by the worth of your data.
Personalised Security Programme for You
Each company’s security programme is different since it is the outcome of threat modelling and mapping. They rely on the size and composition of an organisation. The CTO’s objective is integration or getting security ingrained in the corporate culture throughout the early phases of firm growth. When a business matures and starts to consider the long term, the CTO can change their focus to foresee regulatory requirements and stop new types of attacks. This transition takes your business from using common industry practises to displaying best industry practices
The security program’s functioning expands as well. Normally, the CTO gets full responsibility for security at first, but gradually, security and technology are divided into separate departments with distinct skill sets. Despite the fact that the CSO and the CTO have different responsibilities, they ought to work to develop a cooperative connection. The influence of the CTO will be increased by building a bridge between these and other departments like legal, finance, and human resources.
Keep in mind that security is an integral aspect of the department’s culture, not merely a box to be checked. Integration and cross-departmental communication are necessary. To effectively lead the business and protect it from both internal and external security threats, the CTO must exercise proactive planning and develop innovative, practical methods.
